Facebook Censors Safe Abortions

Today Facebook removed one of Rebecca Gomperts’ pictures.

 

The image consisted of text instructions of how to safely induce an abortion using medication.

Dr. Gomperts is a well-known abortion rights activist and the Director of Women on Waves – a charitable organization focused on women’s health and human rights. Its mission is to protect maternal health by preventing unsafe abortions. Women on Waves sails a ship to countries where abortion is illegal.

On board the ship the medical staff provides sexual education and healthcare services. Early medical abortion (up to 6 1/2 weeks of pregnancy) can be provided safely, professionally and legally.

Applicability of national penal legislation, and also abortion law, extends only to territorial  waters. Outside that 12-mile radius it is Dutch law that applies on board a ship under that Dutch flag, which means that all Women on Waves activities are legal.

Women on Waves efforts draw much needed public attention to the consequences of unwanted pregnancy and unsafe, illegal abortion.

To date the ship has sailed to Ireland, Poland, Portugal and Spain.

Women on Waves also supported the launch of  safe abortion hotlines in South Africa, Asia and the Middle East.

In 2005 it founded Women on Web, a telemedicine abortion service that provides medical abortions to women in countries where there is no access to safe abortion.

www.womenonwaves.org

www.womenonweb.org

By removing the picture, Facebook is in gross violation of Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Facebook has a social responsibility to guarantee human rights.

Dr. Gomperts reposted the screenshot of the Facebook censorship message with the picture.

She is asking all Facebook users that support abortion rights to repost the message on their page.

 

 

12 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Personhood USA Talks Presidential Politics

Tonight the organization Personhood USA hosted a Presidential Forum via teleconference. Only the candidates who have signed the Pro-Life Pledge were in attendance – Romney and Huntsman were not. To be sure, this wasn’t the first right wing teleconference that I have listened in on and in keeping with what I had heard on others, my expectations were low. But this one was particularly pathetic. No new views, opinions or ideas were expressed and for the most part the candidates seemed to be unenthusiastic about the topic. They simply reiterated the same talking points and reinforced the false claim that this movement is “youth-driven.”

Perhaps the only interesting thing that I took away from this discussion was the sense that the entire pro-life side of the debate is significantly more concerned about religion than about fetuses. While science was brought up a few times, the majority of the discussion pivoted on the idea that pro-life is the Christian position, and that an attack on pro-life ideology is an attack on Christianity. Now, I’ve heard the personhood movement described by anti-choicers as a culture war before, but it was a bit shocking to hear potential Republican nominees discuss it in that manner.

The event opened with Lila Rose who, as usual, sounded more like a preacher than an activist. She used a lot of hyperbole to talk about her experience crafting hoax videos to try to make Planned Parenthood (the largest abortion chain in American – as Rose always adds) look bad. She didn’t say anything that she hasn’t already said. I swear, this girl has one speech memorized and she just repeats it! Still, I find it interesting that they include her, as she been so discredited publicly. It’s probably just because she’s young and they’re really trying to promote the idea that young people support the personhood concept – even though they overwhelmingly do not.

Ron Paul 

Is a pro-life libertarian. You would think that that’s a bit oxymoronic, but apparently it’s not. My dad told me this evening that today Rush Limbaugh was saying that he thinks Paul is really a socialist who was planted by the Democrats. Makes sense. Anyway, Paul used to deliver babies so he’s really quite fond of them. Apparently he needs to brush up on his medical terminology though – it’s a fetus, not a baby. He thinks life is super important, and he also knows that the Republican base cares about it. So, he recently launched a new pro-life ad. Frankly, I’m more interested to see how his libertarian followers justify this particular position than I am about what Paul thinks about it.

Rick Perry

Generally sounded like he was in pain. He was slow, off topic and didn’t really have a whole lot to say. I really think he has concluded his campaign, which is a shame because he’s adorable just like W. In his typical rambling style Perry stated that he supports a Personhood Amendment. He was asked about his former support for allowing exceptions for victims of rape or incest. No more! Apparently, after meeting with a woman who was conceived in rape he decided that it would be best that all women be forced to carry their abuser’s children to term. Also, Christmas strengthened this view for him. How sweet… He then took the opportunity to remind listeners of just how very Christian he is – God has been working on his heart! What? To remove it?

Michele Bachmann 

At first she wasn’t on the call, which gave the hosts the opportunity to talk more about God and how important it is for Christians to be pro-life, and to force it on everyone else as well. But once on, Bachmann took the opportunity to differentiate herself from the other candidates. According to Bachmann, she’s not just pro-life politically, but being pro-life is the core of her conviction. Now, for those of us who recognize that the pro-life position is all about controlling women, this statement basically read “I’m really anti-woman.” But hey, maybe it played better to the intended audience. She also chose to talk about religion here – making the claim that God is pro-life. Yeah yeah, God is a misogynist. We get it. Oh, and our Declaration of Independence is super pro-life, and although the Constitution arguably grants the right to privacy (which the Supreme Court decided meant even about medical stuff- like pregnancy) it’s super pro-life too. Obviously, as they were handed down to the founding fathers from God…or something.

Bachmann talked about how she was going to repeal Obamacare a lot. She also conflated medical abortions and emergency contraception, and argued that Obamacare meant that both would be sold in the bubble gum aisle of stores. Where is this store that has a whole aisle devoted to bubble gum? Is it in Minnesota? Because most the stores I go to sell it in the check out lane…

Oh, and in case you didn’t know – Bachmann has 5 kids and has had 23 foster kids. Which means it’s totally legit for her to take away women’s rights with a Personhood Amendment (which she supports). Mother knows best.

Rick Santorum 

Actually sounded like he might be a presidential candidate. But then he got a little bit distracted and started lecturing. Have you ever tried to listen to him? It’s really hard. He urged listeners to stop saying that they “believe” in things that are obviously fact. Like that God exists, is pro-life and wants to you caucus for Rick Santorum. Or that life begins at conception. Or that fetuses are more important than women. You don’t believe these things. They are facts.

Santorum really hates the trimester framework for thinking about abortion as established by the SCOTUS ruling of Roe v. Wade. For him, a 1 week old embryo is the exact same as an 8 month old fetus. He doesn’t believe this. This is fact.

Additionally, it is fact that “all God’s creatures should be protected.” Is Santorum vegan? Because if not I think he misspoke… And on the God note, Ricky went on to talk about how there’s this huge difference between the freedom of religion and the freedom of worship. He thinks that the freedom to worship is protected in the US, but not so much the freedom of religion. Because apparently the Christian religion is all about forcing Christian views on everyone, and here in America the government is a huge bully and doesn’t let Christians do their Christian thing.

Newt Gingrich 

Took this opportunity to remind everyone that he’s a historian. And to promote his website. And to remind people that he writes stuff and that you can read it on his website. He wants to pass a Personhood Amendment to the Constitution and make it very, very hard to remove. Or pass other legislation that’s very difficult to repeal. Basically, he wants to pounce on this faux-personhood movement to put something in law for everyone forever.

He’s also rabidly opposed to Planned Parenthood. Instead of helping women prevent pregnancy, he wants to use that money to push poor and young women to give their children up for adoption. You know, so wealthy, white Christian parents can raise them – as God intended. He also wants to cut reproductive health funds to foreign countries. You hear that Africa? No more aid for fighting HIV/AIDS! He also thinks victims of rape or incest should toughen up, do the Christian thing and give birth to the offspring of their abusers. It’s what Jesus would do! Oh, and if you didn’t know, Newt is a historian and you can learn more about that on his website.

The forum ended with the host remarking that he felt that the candidates “did the best they can.” And if that’s true than these people have pretty low expectations. There was a bit more talk about the importance of Christian voters, a lot of talk about God and I even heard these white guys drop a couple “brothas.” Truthfully, the whole thing seemed a lot more like a youth group meeting than any type of political discussion. Then again, this is the Christian right we’re talking about.

And if you’ve never had the privilege to go to an evangelical youth event, they’re much like the video below – without the hilarious Jewish girl. 

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

In Defense of Iowa

Early this week former University of Iowa professor Stephen Bloom published a rather derogatory piece about Iowa in the Atlantic- essentially claiming that, as whole, my home state amounts to little more than every bad stereotype that has even been uttered about “fly over country” and that we therefore have no right to host the nation’s first caucus.

While I may agree with him on that last point – and would also argue that it’s time we have a frank discussion about the value of our electoral processes entirely – the manner is which he went about making said point was just a tiny bit tasteless. Oh yeah, and totally untrue. And ridiculous.

Bloom managed to use just enough anecdotal “evidence” to string together a slew of stereotypes and make them seem like a legitimate story. In truth, anyone who has spent any time in Iowa knows that his “insight” is about as accurate as one of those “You Know You’re An Iowan If…” chain mails that we all used to receive in the 90s. And although I’ve been an Iowan for the majority of my life, I can’t really relate. Seriously, I’ve never driven a tractor and I didn’t grow up on a farm.

But maybe I don’t really count as an “Iowan.” After all, my entire extended family lives on the east coast. My dad was born and raised just south of the Canadian border – my mother just south of the Mason-Dixon line. I was born in Boston.

Since moving to Iowa when I was seven years old, my family has dealt with our fair share of Iowa-based stereotypes. Trips to visit relatives always involved lots of questions from cousins – “What do ya’ll do for fun out there?” And teasing from aunts and uncles – “Wait? Do you even know how to use a fork?” But at the end of the day I have to admit, I felt a bit smug about my Iowa upbringing when I compared it to my relatives in Virginia. There was no doubt that my public education was better than theirs, that my group of friends was more diverse, or that an Iowan “accent” just sounds more intelligent than a Southern one. Or a Boston one for that matter.

So yeah, I suppose I’m pretty proud to be an Iowan. In fact, after spending my summer driving across the country I was pretty thrilled to be home. People are just generally nice and reasonable here. In fact, after spending the past two years in Minnesota I have to say that there’s little difference between the two. Are we vanilla? Sure, but everyone loves vanilla. And it goes with just about anything.

I’ll concede that Bloom does get one thing right – his depiction of Iowa as a state divided is pretty spot on. For the most part the eastern portion of the state is intensely progressive, the west intensely conservative. And yes, there are lots of Asian students at the University of Iowa – but please provide me with an example of one major state university where this isn’t the case.

I guess my biggest beef with this article is that while Bloom claims to be making generalizations about the state as a whole, most of his “examples” are more representative of the rural areas of the state (Bloom worked and lived in Iowa City, so I’m going to guess that his first-hand experiences with the “hicks” of Iowa are more imaginings than real lived experiences) and I can’t help but feel like they’re more his musings on what these people would actually be like than what they actually are.

Finally, I have to say that the points that Bloom brings up to demonstrate why Iowa is a worthless, disgusting plot of land are exactly why we are the perfect place to host the nation’s first primary contest. We’re moderate!

We have a little bit of everything. We’re not extreme.

I mean, have you even looked at the shape of Iowa? It’s like a mini USA, and it’s right in the center…

Below I’ve addressed a few of the most particularly annoying stereotypes the Bloom harps on in his piece.

Go ahead and read the real thing if you feel so inclined:

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/12/observations-from-20-years-of-iowa-life/249401/1/

1.) We’re not all farmers.

Most of Bloom’s comments (and his more humorous one-liners) are centered around the assumption – and in his case assertion – that all Iowans are farmers, know farmers, or are in some way involved in “farm culture.” In fact, this couldn’t be further from the truth. Had I not ridden horses (which I did for sport, mind you, not for transportation purposes as Bloom would probably suggest) I would probably had as much interaction with farmland as someone from any metropolitian area.

Additionally:

I’ve never been on a tractor.

I have no idea what a Tractor Pull or Combine Demolition Derby is.

I first heard of Future Farmers of America in college.

I’ve never hunted anything and to my knowledge I don’t know anyone who hunts.

I was a junior in college the first time I tasted deer meat. It was from a friend who lived in Minnesota.

2) Laid-off factory workers exist…um, everywhere.

Aren’t you teaching in Michigan now, Bloom? Enough said.

But seriously, how does this make us any different from any other state?

3) Immigrants aren’t an “Iowa-thing”

But maybe tolerance is.

The fact that Iowa has a sizable population of immigrant workers would seem to fly in the face of Bloom’s there’s – no – diversity – in – Iowa – anywhere and they’re – totally – isolated – from – any – of – the – issues – that – most – states – face arguments, but apparently he didn’t quite piece that together.

As an undergraduate at my tiny, insignificant Cedar Rapids-area college I did work in Postville, IA to help local businesses better cater to their new Spanish-only speaking neighbors. But you know – Iowans are bitter, ignorant hicks who hate diversity. These small town inbreds (as Bloom would characterize them) may not have known how to speak Spanish, but they weren’t clinging to their “English-only” ideals either.

4) Religion is the same everywhere.

I was raised Catholic. Most of my friends were born-again Evangelicals or Lutherans.  We all went to church with each other and I don’t think anyone really ever saw much of a difference.  There’s a mosque down the street from my parent’s house. I had a good friend in middle school who was Hindu (he later when the Catholic high school and we lost touch). My first ever soccer coach was a Jew from Poland.

I’m not saying that diversity is prevalent in Iowa, but it’s there. And not in the we – have – Jews – in – the – classroom – so – let’s – talk – about – their – holiday – to – humor – them sort of way, but in the we’re – going – to – learn – about – this – so – you’re – not – a – ignorant -fuck – when – you’re – exposed – to – it kind.

In fact, it was was my Iowa-native public school teachers who taught me about the hegemonic presence of Christianity in our society and who encouraged me to think critically about it.

Sure, we have the usual “Pray for an End to Abortion” billboards, but I can assure you that they exist along just about every highway in the country.

In fact, I would have to say that in terms of religious fundamentalism Iowa is pretty moderate. Have you been anywhere in the South? My guess is probably not…

5.) We’re an agricultural state…

I’m not really sure what Bloom’s problem is with the fact that Iowa isn’t Los Angeles – but apparently it’s just that. Among his more ridiculous complaints are things like:

We don’t have smog (What? Good clean air for breathing? The horror!)

A lot of the corn we grow goes to feed animals, not people (Do you eat meat? Shut up)

We have a low crime rate (I know. I hate the fact that I can trust my neighbors too)

We are polite drivers (Road rage is apparently as American as…smog?)

In short, because we aren’t reminiscent of a big city, we suck. Even if the things that make us different actually make our quality of life a tiny bit better too.

6.) We eat like Americans.

Except that unlike most other areas of the country, you don’t have to if you don’t want to. Actually, Iowa is one of the few states in the country where it’s plausible to eat an entirely vegan diet of locally grown, organic produce.

But you know, apparently Iowans are all about the pork and deer – and that’s it. And for the record – I’ve only ever tasted either. Contrary to Bloom’s belief, I don’t think my mother has ever served us pulled-pork, and I can’t recall ever eating it.

Bloom concludes his article with a cute little story that I’m going to go ahead and call complete bullshit.

In summary, he went out and bought his kid a yellow lab because “every boy needs a dog” (nice one, you sexist, gender-sterotyping fuck). Then because his kid wasn’t actually responsible enough to take care of it, he was forced to walk it.

I’d just like to point out, for the record, that this little Iowan has always walked her own damn dog. You know, because my hick-Iowa parents taught me about this hick-Iowa thing called responsibility, but I digress…

Bloom’s ultimate complaint, the self-described “crucible” of his problem with Iowa, is that people asked him if he hunted with the dog.

The yellow labrador.

The dog that, according to the AKC, was designed and bred to retrieve game.

THE AUDACITY OF SOME PEOPLE!

You mean Iowans shouldn’t be the first primary state because people are able to see a hunting dog and make the connection and maybe it’s used for hunting?

Idiots.

Let me guess, you had a neon orange hunting collar on her too? 

But, the fact that he bought a hunting dog aside, I’m going to have to go ahead and doubt this story. In part because for 3 years I walked an English Springer Spaniel every day (also a hunting dog) and nobody ever asked me if I hunted with him.

Plenty of my non-hunting friends have labs and they’ve never complained about this.

In all likelihood what happened is that some nice, friendly, Iowan saw a dude walking a labrador and wanted to make conversation. You know, because we’re nice people and all. And instead of going for the generic weather comment, he thought he would compliment his neighbor’s dog. But instead of just saying – pretty dog – friendly-Iowa-neighbor added a question to the end to invite conversation. And what came to his mind when he saw some dude walking a dog that was bred for hunting?

Do you hunt with it?

Bloom concludes with the following:

To me, it summed up Iowa. You’d never get a dog because you might just want to walk with the dog or to throw a ball for her to fetch. No, that’s not a reason to own a dog in Iowa. You get a dog to track and bag animals that you want to stuff, mount, or eat.

That’s the place that may very well determine the next U.S. president.

As stated perviously. I don’t believe his little dog anecdote. Mostly because I’m a dog lover, and I know that most Iowans don’t hunt with their dogs. In fact, I’ve only known one person who does. Even in the tiny town of Algona, IA most people don’t hunt with their pets. I’ve shown dogs, I’ve trained them for  agility and confirmation shows. All of which are pretty common here. Most people don’t hunt with their dogs, and that’s hardly ever assumed.

That being said, I have to ask, what difference does it make?

The reason people don’t hunt in say, New York City, is because there’s nothing to hunt.

Iowa, with its land and agriculture and *gasp* hunting, is just as “American” as anywhere else.

Bloom’s article does little more than play into the argument that there are certain parts of the country that are more legitimate and “American” than others.

That somehow being friendly and moderate means you aren’t qualified to have the first say in who the next presidential candidates should be.

In the end, Bloom’s commentary serves as an unfortunate reminder of just how ignorant and small-minded too many Americans are. It’s a demonstration of that which divides us most.

And finally, it’s a testament to just how bitchy and bitter someone can get when their program is cut from a university and they’re forced to move.

 

Correction: To clarify, the Department of Journalism and Communications and still alive and well at the University of Iowa. My last comment was based purely on rumors that Dr. Bloom took up the opportunity to visit Michigan after the U of I’s undergraduate department lost accreditation last year.

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

When I Needed Help, I Got Propaganda

Check out my latest piece, which was published today in the New York Times!

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/06/opinion/crisis-pregnancy-centers-and-propaganda.html?_r=1&ref=contributors

7 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

A Different Kind of Sidewalk Counseling: What Women Ask Me About Abortion

This  post originally appeared on RH Reality Check.

http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2011/09/18/different-kind-sidewalk-counseling-what-women-about-abortion-1

I’m a sidewalk counselor, but not the kind that you’re thinking of. I don’t stand outside abortion clinics with signs and I don’t approach women to spew ideological propaganda. But like the anti-choicers who block clinic entrances, I often find myself as the one person a woman talks to right before she enters an abortion clinic. As someone who speaks publicly and often about my own abortion, I’m regularly approached by women who are making that same decision. What surprises me about these encounters is that these women are usually not seeking advice or guidance about the morality or legality of the procedure. They don’t bring up the reproductive rights issue of the day. The questions they ask me, the topics we discuss, are shockingly simple and mundane yet they demonstrate the pervasive silence surrounding the procedure and the importance of just talking about it.

After sharing my personal experience with abortion on the MTV documentary “No Easy Decision” I began receiving emails, facebook messages and texts from women I barely knew. These discussions always start the same way, “Can I ask you a question?” 

What follows is rarely a discussion about politics, legislation and even the pro-choice versus pro-life debate. The questions I am asked are, “I have dance class three days after my abortion. Do you think I’ll be okay?”

And, “There are two different options for painkillers. Which one should I pick?”

 They say, “I want to tell my mom. How do I do that?”

And wonder, “Do I need to get a babysitter for the kids that night?”

They ask me what to expect from the clinic staff: “Will they be nice?”

 “What questions are they going to ask me?”

“Is it weird being in the waiting room?”

I answer their questions as honestly as I can and make referrals and references when necessary but for the most part I just listen. And it seems to me that that’s all they really want, to voice the concerns that most people would consider to be inconsequential. They want to be heard, to be understood, to relate. They want to calm their nerves. They want me to remind them that I did it and that I’m fine. It may sound strange but it’s totally normal.

I know because I did the same thing with my best friend. She was the first person I called after I found out I was pregnant, because I knew she had had an abortion. We didn’t talk about my actual decision at all. Instead I asked her if it would be weird if I brought my boyfriend, what I should do after the procedure and how long it would take for me to feel normal again. I also asked if the clinic would be cold, if I should bring a sweatshirt and if there were any protesters when she went.

As someone who is on both the personal and the political sides of the debate I’m always shocked by how different those two sides can be. And while both are equally important, I can’t help but notice that one side gets significantly more attention than the other. Maybe it’s because the politics are louder. Or maybe it’s because debates over laws are just that much more important than debates of whether women should have to recover from the procedure in the same room. I can’t be sure but I often get the sense that women who have abortions are just as alienated from the pro-choice movement as they are from the mainstream.

If we want the pro-choice position to support real women’s lived experiences with abortion we need to be willing and able to discuss the things that really matter to them. Not all women who have had abortions will have opinions on the latest legislation, and not all are directly affected by it, but we all know what it’s like to sit in a room with dozens of other women and stare at our feet.

What the pro-choice movement needs is more sidewalk counseling. Okay, not really sidewalk counseling and preferably not on sidewalks. But we need to start doing for real what sidewalk counselors claim they do. We need to listen to women. We need to address their concerns and accept their opinions without judgment. We need to share our own stories, even the seemingly trivial parts. That’s the only way to break down stigma, to support women, and to elevate conversation beyond the divisiveness of partisan politics.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Lil Wayne’s Abortion

Again, just another example of abortion being referenced without the usual melodrama.

Enjoy.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

I saw my sonogram, here’s why I think you shouldn’t have to…

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Advertising with Abortion

Okay, I’m a little bit late commenting on this. Frankly, it took me awhile to decide how I felt about it. Today I saw this ad again and it is now the wallpaper on my desktop. Here’s why.

About a month or so ago a friend of mine tweeted this image, which was an advertisment in some sort of “women’s” magazine.

Most of the commentary from my twitter friends was tinged with disgust. They felt that the ad trivialized the issue and was attached to consumerism in a way that made them uncomfortable. Afterall, women don’t make the choice to terminate a pregnancy the same way we choose whether or not to buy a purse (a sentiment often leveled at us by the anti-choice movment) and this image draws dangerously close parellels to that notion.

Abortion isn’t as trivial or shallow of a choice as  deciding which purse to buy is, and in some sense the comparison is hurtful.

BUT

The fact that abortion was elluded to in a mainstream publication without the usual melodrama is so freshing!

Frankly, anything that breaks down the stigma around talking about abortion is just fine in my book, even if  its potrayal of the isse is a little bit problematic.

Then again, this is coming from the girl who got started in the pro-choice movment by appearing on a reality television show, so take that how you will.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Telling family, “I had an abortion”

Those of you who are familiar with my story know that I didn’t immediately tell my family about my abortion.

My aunt was the first person I called, but otherwise I kept information about my unplanned pregnancy to myself. As I’ve stated before, this had less to do with how I felt they would react, and more to do with the fact that I knew that abortion was the right option for me and I didn’t need anyone’s permission. Additionally, I hadn’t wanted to add more drama to an already emotional situation, as my mom and dad we about to become grandparents for the first time with the arrival of my sister’s son, Carter.

Prior to No Easy Decision I had to tell my parents and my siblings and the rest of the world found out via facebook. I assumed that because I announced my participation through social media the whole world would know, but I forgot to tell some very important people.

Well, it wasn’t so much that I forgot to tell them, but more that I didn’t know how…

I’ve always been jealous of people who have close relationships with their grandparents, but for me that’s never really been an option.

Living 12 hours away from all extended family means that it’s difficult to pop by for a visit. And because I wasn’t usually in direct contact with them, calling them up to say, “I had an abortion” seemed incredibly awkward.

Oh, and did I mention they’re Catholic?

While my family has always had more liberal views than the Church regarding social issues like sex education, contraceptive use and gay rights, they’re also very involved in their individual parish.

I mean come on, my great grandmother plays cards with priests!

So naturally, I was less than comfortable with calling them up and blurting out that I had an abortion.

But gossip and social media being what it is, it was inevitable that they would eventually find out. And that happened this past weekend.

My mother emailed me to let me know that my grandmother and great grandmother had found out about the abortion and MTV. She assured me that while they were hurt that I hadn’t told them, they we fine with the fact that I had had an abortion. “Unconditional love” as she put it.

I have no doubt that the next time I seem them I’ll be nervous that they know this about me. It wasn’t how I wanted them to find out, and frankly, I’m not sure that I wanted them to find out at all. Knowing that someone you love had an abortion immediately involves you in one of the most contentious debates of our time. I didn’t want that for them.

At the same time, I’m glad they know. Now I don’t need to explain why I’m so passionate about reproductive rights, or why I’ll never vote for a Republican.

And while their personal and political views on the subject may not change because of my story, at least I know that when they think of abortion they won’t be thinking of some obscure political ideology, that only bad girls have them or that the people who choose them are heartless. When they think of women who have had abortions, they won’t be tempted by the myths. When they think of women who have had abortions, they’ll think of me.

Maybe that will influence their politics, maybe it wont. Maybe they’re pro-choice already. But either way, I’m glad to have their support.

 

8 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Some Pro-Voice

Watch Natalia of No Easy Decision and Aspen Baker of Exhale throw down some pro-voice truth on Grit TV. Watch the segment here.

 

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized